Thread: "game" or "sim"
View Single Post
  #7  
Old 06-04-2012, 05:17 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by BP_Tailspin View Post
What is the difference between a Flight "game" and a "sim" ?

If we keep this thread civilized and treat each other with respect this should develop into a great discussion.
Most people think the harder it is to fly the more realistic it is.. Which is not the case

A lot of people think Air Force flight simulators have better flight modeling than PC flight sims.. Which is not always the case.. As a mater of fact most military flight simulators care very little about the flight modeling.. They are more interested in training the pilots how to use the 'systems' of the plane vs. standing the plane on it's tail during a dog fight.

To make an analogy, the Microsoft types of flight simulators focus more on talking to the tower, taxi to the runway, calculating your vector to the next way point.. All of which does NOT require realistic 6DOF flight modeling.. Where as a WWII style of up close and personal gun fight 'game' does

So in summary

You may find the so called 'games' have better flight modeling than some if not all military flight simulators used for training pilots
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote