View Single Post
  #178  
Old 06-02-2012, 07:43 PM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
I will rephrase it, 87 octane was used in fighter command for operational missions until the switchover to 100 Octane.
Thank you. When did this alleged switch over to 100 octane happened, dear David? With documentary evidence if possible.

Quote:
However there is no evidence that 87 octane was used for combat missions after the switchover during the BOB from July onwards.
Of course, since it was standard fuel in the RAF. Similarly, there's no evidence that 100 octane fuel was used in more than a a couple of dozen cases out of thousands of fighter sorties, right David?


Let's get back to that allaged switchover, now you have seem to have changed your position and now state that this was supposed to have happened in July 1940. What documentary evidence can you offer to this so-called switchover, David?

Quote:
Now if you or Crumpp can supply any evidence that says 87 octane was used in operational missions in or after July 1940 a lot of people would be very interested.
Again, we need to specify the type of evidence required. Should combat reports that do not mention the use of emergency boost or +12 lbs/sq.inch constitute such an evidence, David?
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org