View Single Post
  #5  
Old 05-19-2012, 04:22 AM
bw_wolverine's Avatar
bw_wolverine bw_wolverine is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ernst View Post
About the overall 109 performance (dive, speed, acceleration etc) on that test you have to account that it was a British test and the 109 captured, probably far away from its original performance and conditions. However some of it fighting qualities and low speed handling were evident. More:

The same document is saying that the Spitfire and Hurricane have superior turning at slow speeds and that pilots aren't likely to attempt it because they're worried about the flick stall.

Well, CloD pilots probably are a little more risky with their turns than real life ones, so they're getting that better performance at low speeds.

If the 109 doesn't stall out as bad as the game is modelled (ie, the plane settles out into a slip and the pilot can easily recover by leaving the turn - centering the controls) that doesn't explain some people then saying that the 109 should be able to turn inside the Spit or Hurricane?

I'm confused now.
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP

No.401 Squadron Forum


Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book
Reply With Quote