View Single Post
  #14  
Old 05-17-2012, 12:51 PM
bw_wolverine's Avatar
bw_wolverine bw_wolverine is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Plt Off JRB Meaker View Post
Agreed,the 109 did sound better in the previous patch,I think it was one of the things that the majority of us had agreed on I thought,and we were full of praise for it.I can remember loads of us commenting on here how good it was.

Why then the devs decided to change it God only knows,are they really reading the comments on this forum?,one would have to wonder.

It's not rocket science to realise then,why the patches are taking so long to come to fruition.........they're wasting time IMO on the stuff that could be left alone.
I doubt the sound guy is trying to fix crashes in the engine code :/ He might as well do something.

It's possible that the change in the 109s sound is a bug as a result of the changes to the Spitfire / Hurricane sounds, applying it to the DB engine as a mistake. We'll have to see.
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP

No.401 Squadron Forum


Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book
Reply With Quote