View Single Post
  #159  
Old 05-17-2012, 01:27 AM
BlackBerry BlackBerry is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 126
Default

Quote:
To our dismay and disappointment, the 16-series propeller showed no advantage at high speeds; in fact the Clark Y appeared slightly
better.

Page 124 tells the story...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46042585/T...rams-1920-1950
How high speed? 400MPH TAS?

I coldn't open this link.

Athough 3-blade Clark-Y airfoil airscrew slightly outperformed 3-blade NACA-16 airfoil, you can't draw the conclusion that 3-blade NACA-16 outperforms or same as 4-blade NACA-16.

Why didn't German keep 2-blade Gottingen airfoil in WWII? 3-blade Gottingen airfoil is better than 2-blade Gottingen?

Quote:
The Germans were resource and production limited so not having to produce another blade is attractive. Saving weight in any airplane is attractive. The German fighters had sychronized weapons firing through the propeller disc. Less blades means more bullets on any given target.
Don't forget 2-blade Gottingen prop. could save more resource and more friendly to sychronized weapons firing through the propeller disc.

Again, German's 3-blade Gottingen vs 4-blade Gotingen comparation is not valid for 3-blade NACA-16 vs 4-blade NACA-16.
Reply With Quote