View Single Post
  #23  
Old 05-13-2012, 04:21 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by FFCW_Urizen View Post
AoA, the problem is not that AI always flies their planes flawless, the problem is not that they get the best out of their engines, the problem is, that due to a simplified fm/dm, they can achieve and hold their best settings indefinetely without ever(!) overheating or damaging their engine. Just fire up a quick mission in a spit or hurri, engage autopilot and watch the boost/rpm gauges closely and watch your temps never exceeding 80° Oil/105° Water at revs around 2800 to 3000 with rads fully closed!!!
And that is what most are talking about when they say the AI cheat..

In essance the AI can run the engine longer at peek settings than the real user.. I take that to mean that at the time of IL-2 (10 years ago) dev, they didnt think they had the resorses or smart enough AI to manage all those things.

On that note, prior to reaching the point where the real user's plane overheats, I don't recal 1C ever stating that the AI was able to obtain more performance than the real user.

With that said

That was all true of IL-2, I have yet to see 1C come out and say that is still the case with CoD
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote