Thread: Spit IIa is now so much more inferior to the 109
View Single Post
  #9  
Old 05-12-2012, 08:50 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kwiatek View Post
Sry to say but SPit MkI or Mk II wasnt slowier then 109 E it was rather opposite. With 100 Octan fuel it was faster at low alts then 109. 109 had litlle adventage in higher alts.
Okay that's it you have had your 100 octane discussion it is time for the blue to have there own magical fuel.

If the red get 100 octane then the blues should get the E4/N and 100 octane aka the C-2 fuel.

Happy now
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.