Quote:
Originally Posted by ATAG_Snapper
I'll check into that. Engine torque would also affect ground handling AFAIK.
BTW, I'm no test pilot -- real life or virtual. I certainly invite anyone/everyone to try this or any variation and/or aircraft. It was Camber's post somewhere in this forum that got me to wondering about offline to online. The A2A data I had done earlier for my own interest -- apples to oranges as I've already expressed on this forum.
|
Hmm, my test results are fast compared to others on this forum...as a professional scientist this worries me
Obviously on-line "test piloting" is not particularly precise, but SL speeds should be reasonably comparable I think with care.
I can get on ATAG and fly for hours without CTD post patch as long as I stay away from other planes
so I retested on-line and offline for the Spit II only.
To summarise:
* significant and unpredictable speed differences between the tool tip (roundimg to 10mph doesn't help), the cockpit gauge and the no-cockpit gauge.
* No real difference between online and offline speeds for me, and Spit II offline speeds consistent with last test
* full to 1/2 radiator makes a small difference (about 10mph)
* canopy closed/open makes no difference
Again, ball centred, wave skimming, time allowed to settle.
Online speeds are
(tool tip reading)/(approx cockpit gauge to 5mph)
1/2 rad +6.25psi 3000rpm 270/275
full rad +6.25psi 3000rpm 260/265
1/2 rad +9psi 2800rpm 290/290
Offline speeds we can also add the no cockpit gauge
(tool tip reading)/(approx cockpit gauge to 5mph)/(no cockpit gauge)
1/2 rad +6.25psi 3000rpm 260/270/270
1/2 rad +9psi 2800rpm 280/280/293
I think the new patch is trying to make me feel better, it CTDs so fast so it lets me get there faster than others
