Quote:
Originally Posted by bongodriver
Even if the fighter losses are comparable the RAF fighters had to shoot down huge numbers of bombers too, the LW only had to deal with fighters, so the RAF chaps had to do all that in the middle of their aerobatic routines.
|
But so had the Luftwaffe to fight off the parallel campaign by the Bomber command.
BTW the RAF destroyed just about 20% more aircraft than the LW with the advantage to fight over own territory. It is not to dismiss the capability of the RAF pilots who did an outstanding job nor the performance of the RAF planes. I personally think from the performance sides (planes and pilots) both sides were quite equal.
Other aspects however came into the game:
LW used better fighter tactics.
RAF fought over own territory.
LW set out to conquer air supremacy.
RAF defended their home country.
LW had - at least initially - the higher numbers.
RAF had radar and a very clever defence system.
LW had experience.
RAF had better fighter production output.
To my opinion having read a couple of books I think that this battle, which was overall a battle of attrition was won by the RAF by shooting down not more aircraft than the LW but by shooting down aircraft quicker than the LW could replace before the LW could achieve its objectives (also due to highly flawed German strategy). That's why Britain won.