Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
The whole 'no proof that the standard fuel was kept being used' is a red herring by those who cannot provide evidence that every unit has changed over to 100 octane, simple as that. They can't prove their thesis, so they want others to disprove it. It's a weird, reversed logic.
Suppose I come up with an idea that there is a second, smaller sun in the Sol system, hiding behind the Sun all the time so we cannot see it. I can't prove it of course, but unless you prove its not there, I declare its very existence cannot be denied, due to the 'overwhelming' amount of evidence.
|
That is one of the most pathetic attempts at an argument I think I've ever seen.
There is PROOF of use of 100 octane in this very thread. It's now up to you to prove that 87 was also in use, not just because you say it is, but because, like us you present some proof.
You're basically doing the internet equivelent of sticking your fingers in your ears an 'la la la-ing'
How can the burden lie soley with one side of the discussion and not the other.
So, like I keep saying to Crumpp, present your case and stop trying to wriggle out of it with meaningless words.
Show me what makes an educated person like you think that 87 octane was in widespread use by FC during the BoB. Next post.