I love how Kurfurst posts data with 'calculated' and 'estimate' figures but no actual flight tests. This would be fair enough but for the fact that it's the opposite stance he takes when dealing with RAF data.
Just thought I'd throw that out there before people start to actually believe this guy, just in case you aren't aware of his reputation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buchon
28mph is a lot of speed, yes, but that´s with Boost.
The performance line posted by B6 is the base performance line, meaning without Boost.
If you make a base performance line with the performance of Boost line then you will have a aircraft with the Boost on all the time, and that´s obviously unrealistic.
You should make the base line performance and then model a Boost behavior that provides the performance of Boost performance line.
And that mean model a high altitude, overheating and damage behavior for Boost too, that´s not easy but they are on it.
I´m full for historic accuracy and for the correct Boost implementation, of course.
|
At present the 12lbs boost is simply not modeled, so even applying it is not possible. Nobody here is suggesting that 12lbs needs to be available for unlimited times, but for the historically accurate times. Please see bug 174 in my sig......and vote for it
