View Single Post
  #10  
Old 04-23-2012, 11:37 AM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

There could be a reason for the difference; read #1219. I know that there is a set of Spitfire II notes on Scribd; these show that there have been no amendments and it is possible that the operational limits for the Merlin XII were originally set at +9 lbs boost, later pushed to +12 1/2 lbs. (Paragraph 4 of the attached document does state that the Merlin XII was cleared for this boost.) It is possible that on operational units an amendment slip specifying +12 1/2 lbs was issued with the notes.

There is a small possibility of printer error, for example on p3 it describes the Spitfire II as being "powered by a Merlin III..."

Correction: This particular set of notes does incorporate some amendments, on top of page 6 and 19 "Amended by A.L.No.6" - interesting; this indicates they could have been republished later than July 1940.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg spit1-12lbs.jpg (286.8 KB, 16 views)

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 04-23-2012 at 11:50 AM. Reason: Correction...
Reply With Quote