Carguy said:

>>I`m affraid it is painfully irrelevant to the stance many people set for this game. Many users have simply chosen to crash what is left from this title with sheer negativity. <<

It crashes quite enough by itself...

>>Some post that crap here even if they got their refund months ago. You just have to put up with them. They can only see the end of their own noses.<<

Some can't even see that far...

>>IMO CloD as a project failed miserably at the point it wanted to become not an upgrade of IL2, but a whole new invention.<<

Well I'll be damned....that might just account for a bit of the negativity, no?

>>No matter how you trust 1C, you have to take the facts into account. <<

At long last, hosannahs, hallelujahs....do we see a softening....is there light at the end of the tunnel...?

>>Polls say everything about how many percent of CloD buyers play it often. <<

Yes, so stop shooting them down when they want to make their opinions heard. It is fully justified.

>>And a whole year after it got released, even the bigest fan has to become skeptical at some point.<<

You're learning, you're learning....even at the expense of most of your previous posts, and earlier sentences within this post.

This sums up the dilemma of the die-hards...now they have no choice but admit it's largely a broken mess...but they're damned if they're ging to let anyone else point out on their own terms. No, far too grown up for that.

>>People keep comparing this title to the Rise of Flight and keep promoting it here depsite all the differences. Go figure. <<

Yes, for both wrong reasons. And Plenty of people say 'it was a mess, too, on release, now look at it. So Clod will be fine'. ROF is used as a football by everybody on whichever side.