View Single Post
  #12  
Old 04-23-2012, 07:31 AM
Kurfürst Kurfürst is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 705
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
As can be seen here the power of the Merlin III +12 boost at sea level is about 1190bhp (= 1207 PS) and increases to 1310bhp (= 1328 PS) at 8800 feet.
The highest power of the DB601N is given as 1260 PS.

At 5km (= 16,404feet the DB601N again has again 1175 PS, compared to the 1025bhp (=1039 PS) of the Merlin III.

At 7,62km (= 25,000 feet) the DB601N still has 850 PS (= 838bhp) compared to the 750bhp (= 760 PS) of the Merlin III.

So basically the Merlin III has slightly higher power at low and moderate altitudes (32 to 68bhp), however the DB601N has much more power at high altitudes (~90PS).

I'm wondering why the manifold pressure of the DB601N is 1.35ata, I had expected something like 1.4-1.45.
It was possible to raise the RPM of the 601A/N above FTH and thus improve high altitude output by increasing revs/capacity of the supercharger, and maintain manifold pressure to higher altitudes.



The already posted DB 601N chart does not show did, though it shows the effect of RPM increase at lower settings. Based on that it would be a reasonable estimate IMHO that the power output of the 601N above 4.8 km could be increased by 100-150 PS, for example to about 950-1000 PS at 7.62 km (25k feet) by increasing the rpm to 2800.

As per Blatt 6 of the 109F-1/F-2 increasing the rpm to 2800 at FTH resulted in 10-15 km/h speed increase. http://kurfurst.org/Performance_test...1F2_DB601N.PDF
__________________
Il-2Bugtracker: Feature #200: Missing 100 octane subtypes of Bf 109E and Bf 110C http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/200
Il-2Bugtracker: Bug #415: Spitfire Mk I, Ia, and Mk II: Stability and Control http://www.il2bugtracker.com/issues/415

Kurfürst - Your resource site on Bf 109 performance! http://kurfurst.org
Reply With Quote