Quote:
Originally Posted by Luftrofl
I gave a 1 star game a 1 star rating a full year after it was released and warned that the last reviews were a ploy to increase the rating. This is obvious since they were all posted the same day as this thread. 1 year and this game is STILL 1 star quality.
You want people to rate the game based on your opinion of what it MIGHT be several months and patches from now.
Take off the rose-colored glasses, it's been a year now. If you don't think this game deserves a bad rating A WHOLE YEAR after release you are too far gone to convince.
6 months since the last sign of progress and you still have faith?
Enjoy your wait.
Wasted enough time here tonight as it is. Back to Battlefield 3.
|
You sound like a petulant child, quite a pathetic example of humanity.
If the devs had taken our money and pulled the plug then I'd be the first one to step up and give the company a bad rating. As it happens they are working very hard to deliver and have shown in prior patches what they're capable of - look at the way sound improved.
When I see a team working hard to improve a product, I think they deserve support, especially when there are so few other companies willing to put the effort into producing the high fidelity sims we crave.
If you read my review there are no lies in there - I've highlighted the good and bad things and left the reader to make up their own minds. I've explained the need for good hardware and suggested waiting for the next patch reviews.
What you have left on the amazon site is childish and damaging. If you have so little respect for 1c and their product then I suggest you sod off and go back to your console games.