View Single Post
  #11  
Old 04-18-2012, 08:59 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robo. View Post
My point is that early Merlin were not designed to operate at 4.5lbs. boost max. I am aware of the conversion issues and I only tried to point out that Crumpps assumtion was wrong.
According to this article the Merlin was designed as "1,100 hp-class" engine to fill the gap between the 700 hp Peregrine and the 1,500 hp Vulture.

However I don't think Crumpp claims that the Merlin was limited to +4 1/2 boost at any time, if he does he will certainly provide a document to support this claim. I think he consider the "maximum continuous rating" of every engine as the design goal and uses this value to compare different engines. He's free to do so. Others consider the maximum power, and some may use the takeoff power. It doesn't matter, the engine remains the same.