Quote:
Originally Posted by irR4tiOn4L
(...)
|
Fair enough, what you wrote makes sense. I agree the changes should be systematic.
Just re 109 trim - I have mentioned it was quite different in both design and operation to the 'other' trims. That's why the 109 has been primarily spoken of.
Re ''now incorrect modelling of carburetors and dont have to deal with mechanical guages'' - could you perhaps explain further? I don't know what you mean and from my online experience I'd say the neg-G cutouts are quite harsh and unforgiving.