View Single Post
  #6  
Old 04-15-2012, 02:59 AM
irR4tiOn4L irR4tiOn4L is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 138
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Igo kyu View Post
No.

What is said is that the RAF lacked oxygen bottles with connectors compatible with Luftwaffe oxygen systems.

Without oxygen, 18,000 ft is a hard ceiling for pilots, and even 17,000 is iffy.

IIRC it turned out that the 109 was much better than the Spitfire at very high altitudes, which was a surprise to the RAF because they hadn't tested captured aircraft at high altitude because they didn't have oxygen bottles that fitted the aircraft.
Thanks for that clarification, the pilot's notes didn't make that clear as far as I could see - only said "owing to the absence of oxygen apparatus in the M.E. 109".

My other points stand though I suppose.
Reply With Quote