View Single Post
  #24  
Old 04-14-2012, 05:33 PM
Kwiatek's Avatar
Kwiatek Kwiatek is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 367
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nephris View Post
Kwiatek dont get me wrong and this is for sure no offend, but I know you from Il2 times in Ultrapack and I got the deep impression that you are trying to push your finds for whatever there comes.I really have deep respect for your work and time you put into it.
An affinity to red planes was very obvious through your development and I am sure you can remember the discussions in the Ultrapack forums about FM which were sometimes more than hot.
I fly both sides so I actually dont care, as there will always be a plane for me I am satisfied with and I like to take the challenge even in an unbalance mix (e.g. vs a Spit 9 in Il2)

Those copied documents are fine for sure, but it is not the evangelium.

Do you suppose the developers did no research and adjusted the FM from the hip and just those documents posted here are the correct and not doubtable ones? This would be indeed pretentious.

Besides that, hold your breath until the beta patch got public and test it yourself to make a decent statement. Each disussion before is just heating things up for nothing.
Im flying all side planes also and i not familair with any side. I like flying the same Spitfire 109 or Fw 190. If you have some more knowledge in WW2 fighters performacne you should be know that i fixed also blue side planes e.x. i fixed acceleration problem in all Fw 190 planes, i made more close to RL data 109 E performacne ( stock IL2 109 E was too slow and too worse in turn) and many other fixes. You should ask Hades who is Ultr@pack founder and mostly blue side pilot what he thinks about my FM work.

And Yes i think 1C didnt make fairly reserch in BoB planes performacne. Just look at actual performacne planes in CLoD. Most people who have some knowledge in these knows these.

And Yes i after reading Luthier new's about FM changes i have big DOUBTS that they made it in fair way again.

I dont write which plane should be better but i just expect that they at LEAST use reliable and i think no mystery data and AT LEAST they will do it in fair and historical way.

Most needed data are here and i think that there will be really hard to find better one:

http://forum.1cpublishing.eu/showthread.php?t=20110

I dont ask nothing more.
Reply With Quote