Quote:
Originally Posted by Crumpp
There is no resistance to evidence. I just don't call random clippings of documents out of context combined with assumption evidence.
.
|
I have asked you a couple of times once in the forum and once in a PM to let me know which document you are referring to as being out of context and I would do everything I can to ensure that you get everything I have. I even offered to get you a full copy of the paper you have concerns about
To date you haven't told me which ones you are referring too just that you are getting your own.
What I do ask, is that you stop running down the papers that I have posted until you can prove that they are out of context or in any way misleading.
If they are then I will apologise to one and all and leave this forum for good. However if they are not miseading or out of context then I expect you to apologise for this accusation.
If you cannot support your theory that the RAF only had 16 squadrons of fighters using 100 Octane at any one time then I expect you to withdraw that theory and apologise for wasting everyones time. Is that fair enough?
I repeat that I believe my case to be a strong case not a perfect one, but I have at least supplied a number of documents covering, all aspects of the case. Which is a lot more than can be said for the 16 squadron theory