View Single Post
  #837  
Old 04-01-2012, 07:31 AM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glider View Post
You are of course free to believe what you like but you cannot claim any facts, for instance.

a) You do not know which squadrons
b) You do not know which stations
c) You do not know how it was to be distributed
d) You do know the roll out schedule,
e) You do not even know if the schedule was kept at 16 fighter squadrons as the last para states that this is subject to change.

Now if you can prove any of the above, you might have a case as without any proof you do not have any facts

Can you list the facts you do have.
Indeed. The 16+2 squadrons were planed, and we don't have a document that proofs that the numbers of the plan were reached, not reached or even exceeded.
Of course we have the combat reports that show way more squadrons. Remains the "rotation theory" but this is clearly wrong. There are combat reports of 41 Squadron that proof the use of 100 octane fuel during their time in Hornchurch (11 Group) and few days later when they were back in Catterick (13 Group).