Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst
I guess where everybody else who has lost interest in the thread, which is pretty much about three RAF fanatics who doesn't even fly in the sim desperately trying to sell a pet theory that nobody bought.
|
I notice you've gone from arguing the facts to character assasination.. Pathetic.
And you're talking rubbish, why would an RAF fanatic (as you put it) argue that the RAF had 100?
If they didn't have 100 octane then what they achieved in 1940 is even greater than I thought it was.
Truth is what happened happened, if they did it on 87 octane (they didn't, but I'll humour you) then they are even better than I thought they were.
And you nailed it - I'm not making this argument for a video game - It's about what happened, not what you say happened because you can't handle being killed by Spitfires in a computer game.
Seeing as 'everyone else has lost interest' why are you even posting?
To accuse us of being fanatics when you run and maintain a 109 site is frankly beyond hypocritical. Your opinion is so biased as to be of no value what so ever.