View Single Post
  #692  
Old 03-18-2012, 07:59 PM
41Sqn_Banks 41Sqn_Banks is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 644
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurfürst View Post
Yes its seems possible - maybe the repro or the scanning person frankensteined together a couple of manuals.
Indeed, from what I've seen it contains at least amendments 6 and 9.

I did check "Vol. I" for references to IIB and found that the "Introduction" page was changed in June, 1941 to contain the difference between IIA and IIB. The changed part in the text is marked by vertical line.

And A.L. No. 19 from December, 1941 (see header of Section 1 Introduction) contains description of the different handling of IIA and IIB (Para 34a and b).

So I think it was June, 1941 when the difference between IIA and IIB was added to the manual.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Introduction.jpg (360.4 KB, 9 views)
File Type: jpg Section1 Introduction.jpg (262.1 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Section1 Para35a.jpg (301.8 KB, 7 views)
File Type: jpg Section1 Para35b.jpg (317.0 KB, 7 views)

Last edited by 41Sqn_Banks; 03-18-2012 at 08:01 PM.