View Single Post
  #4  
Old 03-09-2012, 07:42 PM
NZtyphoon NZtyphoon is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: NZ
Posts: 543
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 41Sqn_Banks View Post
So what do we need to provide to convince you?
- A combat report from a pilot that use +12 boost on a Merlin II/III?
- A flight test?
- A quote from a manual?
We don't need to provide any evidence to Mr Tomcat because Mr Tomcat has no interest in being convinced - Klem is right, this is just trolling and arguing for the sake of it, otherwise why post inane comments like:

Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP View Post
calm down little jedi
If not to inflame a response?

He claims to know better than A C Lovesey, chief engineer of Rolls-Royce, or W.G. Dudek and D. R. Winans (excerpt from AIAA Paper No. 69-779, Milestones in Aviation Fuels, Esso Research and Engineering Company, New York 1969.) who are respected authorities on the properties of aviation and other types of fuel, or simply ridicules any information he finds uncomfortable, and pushes the same circular arguments, posting very little evidence to back them up. I have better things to do than waste time trying to convince Mr Tomcat - this "ignore" setting is a handy device which I will now use...ahhh, bliss!

Last edited by NZtyphoon; 03-09-2012 at 07:44 PM.