Quote:
Originally Posted by TomcatViP
You shld write comics. You will hve an huge success.
It has been alrdy explained and can be found in many documents.
I myself illustrated this meaning right her ein this thread by linking to a 1954 FLIGHT articles detailing the evolution of teh Merlin eng during the war with details of wich octane was used. 
There is also a second article of FLIGHT that I linked about a respective study of a He111 engine and the Merlin where teh author explained that the Brits eng discovered that the remaining trace of fuel found inside the studied German engine showed that the LW probably was using a fuel withe better octane grade than what RAF used at the time.The article clearly says that it was 92 octane in the German bomber.
More over I hve a thousand times explained and showed that there is no sense to believe that 100 octane will provide a tremendous augmentation of pow in an eng that was not specifically built for that fuel.
Here is a modern example with Turbo Tech (no power eng needed to drive the compression process) : http://wn.com/octane_rating?orderby=..._time=all_time
As I hve alrdy says I don't know what to write more. What 's for sure is that I am loosing my time at a ... 100% rate ! |
Yes Mr Tomcat, I'm sure you're convinced in your own mind that you're right, so there's no point in discussing the matter any further with you is there? Meantime, your Flat Earth Society friends are waiting for you to make your maiden speech to the Venerable Coven of Witches and I believe your pet ostrich has buried its head in sand - again.