Thread: Priorities in a Combat Flight Simulator
View Single Post
  #3  
Old 03-02-2012, 06:17 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default
Quote:
Originally Posted by pupo162 View Post
good effort! im replying to it

ill comment on 42 and 43, some of those are really mixed up, choosign belts is not a major component, and picking convergence is not a minor component. in my opinion that is. amongst other things.

we should also have a "no opinion option", some stuff like "netcode" or modular support, i dont know what they are, and saying needless will biasing the pool.
I know it can be confusing: in my idea the difference between these customization is that the pilot is free to change it on his own.

Ammo selection is dependent on airbase's resource and I don't think the pilot change it on his own. It's more to the squad leader to plan the loadout of the planes. If you take as example CloD, nobody takes the worst ammos... so why should we insert different ammos if only the best are choosed? Instead I think convergence is more free in his customization, since it's not dependent on resource.

I agree with the "no opinion". This weekend I'm going to update it.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.
Reply With Quote