View Single Post
  #786  
Old 03-01-2012, 02:21 PM
bw_wolverine's Avatar
bw_wolverine bw_wolverine is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 622
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt View Post
That would be a very good idea, but only if they publish the parts of the readme they are 100% sure will make it into the patch.

I really want to see some specific details about what is getting fixed, but if something is included in the readme and then it doesn't make the patch, we'll have to deal with a lynch mob situation here

So, like jimbop says, if it's possible ask Luthier to give us part of the readme for the fixes that you are 100% sure will go into the patch.

That doesn't have to be complicated things that can break when something changes (like an entire graphics or sound engine).

A lot of people would be happy to know about specific, isolated aircraft systems, which are (i suppose) not so dependent on other parts of the code and thus, easier to be sure if they are done or not.

For example "the bombsights have been corrected", or "the ju88 gyrocompass works and the He111P's compasses no longer display reversed headings".

If you can do this BlackSix it would be very appreciated by many in the community. Thanks for the information
While I pine like the rest of us for a look at the fixes, there's no 100% assurance that something will be in a beta patch until the patch is available to download, so I don't think it's a good idea to release any info like this until the patch is done.

Please let it be soon! I'm sure Luthier and the team are desperate to give us good news when they can since we're all such a sour bunch to start
__________________
Pilot #1 (9:40 hours flying time, 3/0/1 Fighters, 7/2/0 Bombers). RIP

No.401 Squadron Forum


Using ReconNZ's Pilot Log Book
Reply With Quote