Quote:
Originally Posted by Seadog
Then why is there abundant evidence showing widespread use of 100 octane, and literally dozens of memoirs and histories showing the use of 100 octane, and many individual combat reports showing the use of 100 octane? Why are there no memoirs or squadron level or individual combat reports stating the use of 87 octane fuel?
I can't prove something that didn't happen, and there is NO evidence showing 87 octane fuel use during Spitfire or Hurricane combat sorties during the BofB.
There is evidence for widespread 100 octane fuel use during Spitfire or Hurricane BofB combat sorties , but no evidence of Spitfire or Hurricane combat sorties using 87 octane.
|
There is no black and white!
There is evidence that selected squadrons where supported with 100 oct.
There is NO evidence that ALL squadrons where supported with 100 oct.
There is a grey zone, or maybe schroeders cat, which isn't, and can't be, defined.
The compromise solution might be that the overwhelming majority did use 100 oct.