View Single Post
  #1  
Old 12-28-2011, 04:13 AM
tk471138 tk471138 is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 285
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by csThor View Post
Quit your wishful thinking, Krt_Bong. There is a contract between 1C and NG in place which does prevent the official inclusion of any further NG-related objects without considerable cash input. And since TD is sanctioned by the developer we're under that official umbrella.

Let it go folks, that horse is dead and decayed. No chance of resuscitation.


who cares governments always go back on contracts they sign...so why not 1c...at least in this case the 1c would have justification to break their contract and no one is hurt in any way as a result...i would really like to see that contract and to understand why the developers signed it...i dont know why any one would tie their hands like this....as some others have stated i dont think they knew exactly what they were getting into...and if the terms of the contract were misrepresented by NG or their lawyers then it is all but null and void, and their signatures on the contract are meaningless...