View Single Post
  #6  
Old 12-13-2011, 06:56 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
It was very easy to do in il2, its simply not the case in CoD, yes everything is there but the process is much longer in CoD at present...
Thank you Krupi!

So it was easier in IL-2, which is not to be confused with it can not be done in CoD, just that it was easier

That is kind of what I was gathering from all the posts.. In that I have yet to see someone post an example of something that can not be done in CoD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by JG52Krupi View Post
why make things more complex!!!?
That one I can answer easily!

As a mater of fact I allready have several times, but Ill say it again

CoD is more complex because it can do more (read has more options)

It is that simple!

And that is true of typically everything in life, the more options you have the more comlex it will be

As I allready poined out, 'IF' 1C could have kept the old and new methods that provide more control/options that many of the mission makers were asking for..

I am sure 1C would have provided both the old and new!

But clearly it was not posiable to do both

Unless you are of the belif that 1C could and did do both, but pulled out the old methods prior to release just to piss people off.. Which I think even the harderst of hardcore doom'n'glooms would agre that is silly
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.
Reply With Quote