View Single Post
  #9  
Old 12-05-2011, 05:23 PM
ACE-OF-ACES's Avatar
ACE-OF-ACES ACE-OF-ACES is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NM
Posts: 2,248
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
No functioning antialiasing alone is reason enough to call this software alpha quality.
Well.. not based on Maus's definition of beta.. If I am reading Maus's definition correctly, to qualify as 'alpha' the 'bug' would have to be CLEARLY a bug.. That is to say it does not work as 'expected' by the programers logic..

Correct me if I am wrong, but that 'feature' was disabled by 1C prior to release, thus the programer disabled it, thus the programer would expect it to be disabled. Thus it is working per the programers loigc and thus not a bug

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Terrible AI,
No, that does not count as a bug.. Not only is this not CLEAR but it is very subjective! That is to say ask 10 people what they think about the AI in CoD and your likly to get 10 differnt ansiwers.. which is not CLEAR by any definition

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
rewriting the graphics enginealso make this software alpha quality.
No, that does not count as a bug.. Because the developer decided to 'upgrade' something does not mean it is a bug

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
and no DX 11 as promised
DX 11 was never advertised (aka promised).. Only DX11 API support was advertised and CoD dose make use of the DX11 API, so the is not a bug

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
There are also too many bugs listed on this forum for me to bother to repeat.
As I half expected.. You could provide no CLEAR/VISABLE bugs

Quote:
Originally Posted by icarus View Post
Clear as crystal to me.
And many like you.. Problem is upon closer inspection it is more myth than fact
__________________
Theres a reason for instrumenting a plane for test..
That being a pilots's 'perception' of what is going on can be very different from what is 'actually' going on.