[klem]

[QUOTE=Ali Fish;366994
Thank you good sir. thank you. its not the only area thats at fault though. however theres tom dick and harry that disagree and see nothing wrong. Tom is the developer, Harry is the 1C forum moderators and Dick is the fanboy that sees nothing wrong. but well said sir. my wavelength. ETHICS ![/QUOTE]

Ali, there's little anyone can say against insoc84's and some others' basic arguments but lets just clarify the 'fanboy' issue because it gets very tedious.

No-one on these forums is saying there is nothing wrong and that the game is complete and fantastic.

Some of us are saying that what we see and can run looks good, is playable, is enjoyable, is already an improvement on IL-2 (in some opinions) and will be great once its been re-built (because that's what's going on). We say that because that's the way we find it. We know some people can't run it and that there are major problems but we believe they will be fixed in time.

If that is a definition of fanboy I have no problem being called one and yes I have been a fan of Maddox Games for about ten years now. But if fanboy is supposed to describe someone who blindly pours adulation on CoD and thinks there's nothing wrong with it then I can't remember any posts that would fall into that category.

Some people can't get over the fact that the game was released before it was ready, can't accept the current situation and that CoD needs to be re-built in some major areas.

Someone experiencing CoD for the first time has every right to post a complaint or two but, looking in the opposite direction to 'fanboy', what has gone way beyond tedious are the guys that keep repeating the same old arguments as if their only purpose in life is to undermine CoD because they have spent $50, can't accept the situation, can't let go and want to see CoD 'punished'.

You might wonder why those people hang around the forum if they think so little of CoD and its future.