Quote:
Originally Posted by GOA_Potenz
ACE you will not give up??? it is starting to be a bit annoying
|
Facts have that affect on some people!
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOA_Potenz
first you talked about resolution, now about real life, the car thing was just an irony mate a 50km/h or even a 10km/h gap will be readable in the gauge in now days resolution standars
|
Agreed.. 50 is much easier to 'see' than the 10 I was talking about at the time I thought we were talking about a +/-10
But now ask yourself..
Why is David and a few 'others' not able to 'see' a change in speed due to radiator settings, where as guys like Tom and SYN_Repent are able to 'see' a change in speed due to radiators settings?
Which group are we to belive?
I say belive, but I really should say which group are we going to have 'faith' in?
Because nothing has been provided by either group to support thier claims one way or another
Which brings us full circle
Where from the get go I have ask people to provide some proof, in the form of a track file for review, and better yet, to log the data (altitude, speed, etc) to a log file while flying
Than we would NOT have to base it on 'faith' or some sort of sick cheerleader prom night popularity contest
Is that too much to ask before someone accuses 1C of having a FM with a bug in it?
I think not