Quote:
Originally Posted by KeBrAnTo
The problem is when you' re on a plane EVERYTHING is in motion respect your position so I don't think you have a point to be honest. If you then add a background when you're looking from above it becomes even more difficult.
I think all ppl who think this way should make difference of what they would like to be and what really it is, sorry m8.
|
Luckily our brain is smarter than us.., cause you can see stuff in movement also when you are in movement: we are not talking of seeing the poles from a train, but seeing a car moving from another car moving.. the brain can see easily that, as can see easily aicraft moving from another aircraft: it is common sense.
the point whatever is that in the article that 6S.Manu put is pretty clear:
pag 7
High or highly visible: DAY 30 to 40 miles - NIGHT 8 to 10 miles
Moderate or moderately visible: DAY 10 to 15 miles - NIGHT 2 to 3 miles
Low or barely visible: DAY 1 to 2 miles - NIGHT 200 to 1000 yards
moreover in the other parts of the interesting article it practically says that is difficult to obtain the real low or barely visible condition because there should be the perfect camo on the perfect terrain (so spitfire on a grain field= bad) and because surfaces like plexiglass and glass are considered high visible, like i suppose the yellow nose of the emil.
@KeBrAnTo; i'm i blind one, but i can see an airplane also far away... so if an airplane disappear also at 5000 meters, and it is not that case, it is closer that happens, (i'm not talking of camo now) in normal conditions of weather and light it is not a good simulation..