View Single Post
  #15  
Old 10-18-2011, 10:02 AM
JG52Krupi's Avatar
JG52Krupi JG52Krupi is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 3,128
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Flanker35M View Post
S!

Sometimes I really wonder how many here work on planes and I mean really maintain and dig in them etc. You would see that 20mm HE inside structure is NOT good Nor will a stream of bullets make your wing aerodynamically better when losing panels or getting gaping holes.

What we have is a game that has to make compromises between playability and performance. So only thing we can really ask for is that the DM is consistent and tweaked accordingly.
Exactly people seem to think that damage won't cause a great deal of problems but in reality you would either bail from the aircraft or try not to induce loads in it from turns etc.. But noooo that's just visual damage HELLO the skin is part of the structure as well it has to deal with loads... Back in il2 if my 109 got a cannon hole in the wing my manoeuvrability was impeded the balance was screwed and I would be running for home. The only reason I was running for home in that spit was due to the engine damage apart from that i could still out turn a 109 lmao....

They really need to work on the damage model and fm now
__________________


Quote:
Originally Posted by SiThSpAwN View Post
Its a glass half full/half empty scenario, we all know the problems, we all know what needs to be fixed it just some people focus on the water they have and some focus on the water that isnt there....
Gigabyte X58A-UD5 | Intel i7 930 | Corsair H70 | ATI 5970 | 6GB Kingston DDR3 | Intel 160GB G2 | Win 7 Ultimate 64 Bit |
MONITOR: Acer S243HL.
CASE: Thermaltake LEVEL 10.
INPUTS: KG13 Warthog, Saitek Pedals, Track IR 4.
Reply With Quote