Thread: 110C7 vs 110C4
View Single Post
  #4  
Old 08-12-2011, 03:37 PM
JG53Frankyboy JG53Frankyboy is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,162
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jojovtx View Post
.........................Now also the 110C4 and 110C7 weigh EXACTLY the same when you remove the bombs from the loadout of the 110C7 even though the 110C7 still has the built in bombrack. Looks to me the two aircraft are the same just one can carry bombs and the other cannot even though there are obvious differences between the two machines.

............................
what do you expect , even more as the developers gave them the wrong canons.......
And btw, i doubt that that these differences in engine equipment in 1940 between these two 110s were a rule.
The more common Fighterbomber of the ErpGrp 210 (and that was the ONLY unit that used the 110 as fighterbomber during BoB ) was the Bf110D-0/B.

Germany would have not won the BoB because of that, but if all 110 Groups would have acted as fighterbombers - they would have done a much better work.
At the Easternfront, the also very few 110 Groups became a mainstay for groundattackwork - till 1943 , than it was over.

anyway, a CoD Bf110 line like:
Bf110C-4 with DB601B-1
Bf110C-7 (to fake the Bf110D-0/B) with DB601Ba (your P)
Bf110C-6 (i would like this 30mm canon ) with ........DB601Ba i would say, because of additional drag
Bf110C-4/N with DB601N, 3 Bf110 Groups used them.

would be my favorite....and, to say it again " give them (except the C-6) their MG-FF/M " !!

and with correct dive behaviour and a working 'Start-/Notleistung' please, and this weird canopy

Last edited by JG53Frankyboy; 08-12-2011 at 04:22 PM.
Reply With Quote