View Single Post
  #16  
Old 07-07-2011, 02:41 PM
6S.Manu 6S.Manu is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Venice - Italy
Posts: 585
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Walshy View Post
There are bugs yes, they are getting fixed yes, are they working through stuff thoroughly? Yes. Is there continual development of the game and fixes? Yes. Are the fixes sometimes slow in coming? Yes and No. But that's all part of game development and research. Oh aye and the major bug of your not remembering to save a loadout ......... well I'm sure the devs will do you personally a little text message for you in game on the loadout screen when you've changed something that pops up just for you as you hover your mouse over the back button before you click it that says something like, "Hey Furbs have YOU REMEMBERED TO SAVE YOUR LOADOUT?" I'm sure they'll be right on that one for you personally mate ............ They are IN THE PROCESS OF FIXING OF IT OR CAN YOU NOT BELIEVE THE THE FIXES THEY HAVE DONE SINCE RELEASE???
The problem here IMO is that having a new working weather system is not a FIX. Some UIs are missing or simply unfriendly... they don't need a fix, all they need is a good analysis by the developer (well before the game was released). And what about the sound engine? Here all we have IMO is a lacking design of the application.

So we are not talking about issue that can be fixed in a pair of hours (109's PP? Still inverted?) but like Luthier said they will need some months because they need to design, develop and test the new modules.
That damned anti-epilessy filter really messed up this game!

I know we must remain positive and cheer for the developers, but I'm really frustrated since we have given so many promises and very few are actually reality.
And of course it's not about the price of this product: happily I would pay more than 50€ to have a good ww2 simulator (the one promised in these years). But all I see is a wasted opportunity to capitalize on the brand of the old IL2.

I'm sad. Really.
__________________

A whole generation of pilots learned to treasure the Spitfire for its delightful response to aerobatic manoeuvres and its handiness as a dogfighter. Iit is odd that they had continued to esteem these qualities over those of other fighters in spite of the fact that they were of only secondary importance tactically.Thus it is doubly ironic that the Spitfire’s reputation would habitually be established by reference to archaic, non-tactical criteria.

Last edited by 6S.Manu; 07-07-2011 at 02:56 PM.
Reply With Quote