
06-25-2011, 12:29 AM
|
Approved Member
|
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,323
|
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptainDoggles
In one of Viper's earlier points he argues that if you don't care about emissions and purposely run a bit rich, then minor variations in fuel/air ratio will not cause problems. Temperatures on the downstream side of the supercharger ought to be plenty high enough to cause evaporation of the fuel droplets, particularly if you aren't intercooling.
On a turbocharged, intercooled engine I'd wager that direct injection would be superior since the turbo is already much more thermodynamically efficient than a supercharger. But on a supercharged engine where the supercharger can pull as much as 30% of the crankshaft's power it's a sound engineering decision to try to increase that efficiency foremost.
|
I think you summed it up.
|