Quote:
OK, so the EULA is not tied to the license issue, HOWEVER, there is a law being broken (if license fees are not paid) and that's the point. Whether or not it's a EULA issue is irrelevant. The hack, to the best of my knowledge, redistributes the ENTIRE executable file and if that's not a "...substantial amount of code..." then I don't know what is. Even if the hack is/were just
a patch file it is still utilizing almost 100% of someone else's code.
|
Copyright does not prohibit all copying or replication. The fair use doctrine, permits copying and distribution without permission of the copyright holder or payment to same. This allows the user to reproduce or adapt copyright material for personal or private use without permission from the copyright owner.