Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Urufu_Shinjiro
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by carguy_
Quote:
|
Read what he wrote dude, he just said that the EULA will not hold up in a court of law but you tell him he has to obey the law.
|
Okay.I wager he is a citizen in a common law system country.If he is so sure this aint gonna hold up in court(at least where he lives) then there must be a precedent stating so so other courts could use it adequately.Cause if that`s just some lawyer`s expertise then it means nothing as mine aswell be other four lawyers who say otherwise(as written in earlier post).
Maybe cite some of it(best it be from his own state if he can do it).
Cuz it`s not his personal "expertise" I wager?  |
What he's trying to point out is that the EULA says that by purchasing the software that your bound by the contract, but a contract is by default null and void if the terms of the contract are not presented up front, which it i not is the case of an EULA. Therefore the EULA will not stand up as it is inherently void.
And Stalker, I'm really not trying to flame you but you are not helping to soothe the paranoia, some of your reasoning and logic is actually feeding it and giving them more ammo. |
read this again buddy..
" " Some copyright owners use EULAs in an effort to circumvent limitations the applicable copyright law places on their copyrights (such as the limitations in sections 107-122 of the United States Copyright Act), or to expand the scope of control over the work into areas for which copyright protection is denied by law (such as attempting to charge for, regulate or prevent private performances of a work beyond a certain number of performances or beyond a certain period of time). Such EULAs are, in essence, efforts to gain control, by contract, over matters upon which copyright law precludes control.