View Single Post
  #7  
Old 05-22-2011, 08:16 PM
jt_medina jt_medina is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 212
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by RocketDog View Post
I'm still rather surprised that they could have got such basic features of a real-world landscape so wrong. We've ended up with very nice 3D models (as good as RoF's) flying over a landscape that is arguably worse than many found in IL-2 1946.
1000% agree.
I saw some pictures from 6 months ago and they looked way better than it looks right now.
I'll give you a few examples. Shots I kept on my harddrive.
[IMG][/IMG]
[IMG][/IMG]


[/IMG]

People can say they look cartonish but I loved them.
Reply With Quote