View Single Post
  #14  
Old 05-08-2011, 06:15 PM
jt_medina jt_medina is offline
Approved Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 212
Default

I love both WOP and COD. However I believe that COD looks and performs like pure crap even on high settings. Sorry if I offend your little hearts but that's what I think.
Flight model and damage model for IL2 COD are awesome but graphically speaking I have to convince myself to keep flying it. COD Is not worth the money in the state it has been released.

WOP is something like strike fighters 2, it has some simulation component but not as accurate as IL2 COD or 1946. Still sometimes graphics may look a bit unrealistic but from the performance and eye candy point of view WOP destroys IL2 COD.

And... I am a big fan of IL2 since it was released but I can't negate that WOP is a simulator with a lot of potential if there was a mission editor and FM, DM was improved it'd for sure be a good option.