Quote:
Originally Posted by mazex
Did one of these comparisons when the first landscape shots of CoD arrived to I thought a revisit with the current version would be interesting as I've read some people that are discontent with CoD that said they where going back to FSX, X-Plane, WoP etc....
So let's compare apples and pears?
FSX on max:
CoD on high (on my old rig with no stuttering and rather OK fluid fps - better than FSX!):
Ohh - and then we have the bunch that say that WoP has so much better graphics than CoD (which they claim does not look much better than IL2). Lets test that?
CoD (aka "the real Deal"?):
WoP:
And add IL2 (pimped):
 |
This is not a fair post. I agree with you on FSX but you are varying the altitudes. WOP at low altitude looks alot better than COD and performes alot better. At high altitude COD looks better though.
ALSO in WOP you can have like 50+ aircraft in the air fighting over a city and it is absolutely stutter/lag free, buildings are all there (there is no filler, so in the distance everything is present and they dont teleport into place).
Misleading comparison (whether intentional or not).
It all runs smooth as silk, and can be played maxed out easy on even low mid range pcs.