I seem to get the best results with loading with incendiary tracers, rest all AP with 2 guns fitted with De Wilde @150m conv. So ok then
half AP/ half incendiary. However, I do feel a bit annoyed about the whole .303 effect on the planes.
For 1 everyone states that if you sit on the six of say a Me 109 and fire that there is nothing of importance in the tail and everything gets blocked by the armour behind the seat of the pilot. Firstly, so what then of the AP rounds? Are they not supposed to pass straight through the armour, the fuel tanks the pilot and hit the engine? X4 in my case. I thing all of the default load outs have at least 1 AP load. Isn’t the tail also considered to be of some importance?
Secondly, everyone then states that the .303 is so ineffective. I guess if you shoot the plane with 1 bullet, then yes in retrospect the effects could be minimal. However, you have 8 very high rate of fire guns firing all at once. The effect on the plane would by more like ripping paper than punching a hundred wholes into it one at a time with a couple of seconds in between.
In combat, planes losing their wings were more an effect of being torn off due to the sudden force of the bullet impact and the fact that the wing is already under strain from the wind flow rather than the struts being individually severed by bullet fire. If you see the amount of cartridges that come out of a fellow Hurri firing, it seems it would be more effective to just fly in front of the enemy plane and have it banged up by the incoming cartridges
BUT.... the last mission in the British campaign: Seeing tracers fly out in the night sky to the enemy plane, the glow of bullet impacts, then the ensuing fire and fire ball upon crashing .... Amazing!