View Single Post
  #6  
Old 04-12-2011, 06:31 PM
erratik erratik is offline
Registered Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 13
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tone71 View Post
20-30 fps seems like par for the course at present.

Seems odd that lowering settings doesn't make much difference though, especially if you were to turn off shadows, roads, lower building/land detail and amount of buildings/trees. Have you tried Kegetys mod?

Hi there. You say 20-30 fps seems average but why are people with lower systems getting 60+ average?. Regardless it would be playable at 30fps constant but it dips to under 10 constantly.

Haven't tried the kegetys mod. I did read about that but assumed it was for people with lesser capable systems? anyway i'll look into that again


Quote:
Originally Posted by b101uk View Post
The graphical futures shown in the vid don’t match with the low setting you posted, I.e. shadows, the amount of trees, building detail, roads, etc.

Have you tried defragmenting you HDD that your game is on.

Have the used ATA channels (for HDD's etc) in device manager had enable DMA under there advanced settings
You are correct, that vid was recorded on default high settings. maybe I should of been clearer. What i meant was I get the same performance as in that clip regardless of the settings it seems. I could record another at very low settings and it would look the same performance wise which I find odd.

I don't defrag as I use SSD's which you don't defrag.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ze-Jamz View Post
Thats about what i get on a similar spec to yours...

again wait for the next patch that will hopefully use your CPU more
I really hope your're right. Am just disappointed I can't play now and feel ripped off. Never had a game so badly optimised at release if i'm honest.

Last edited by erratik; 04-12-2011 at 06:35 PM.
Reply With Quote