Quote:
Originally Posted by Enfield55
If your a bit technically minded check out freetrack.org. Requires 1 x hat, 3 x IR LED's, 3 x resistors, some wire, a WII remote and some patience! I've got mine going great guns and it cost me about $70 including the wii remote!
|
I'm using it already with my webcam and my trackclip pro left-over from my TrackIR 4 setup. It's good and cheap, but i can't for the life of me make it work accurately enough. If it's as fast as i want it's too jerky, if it's smooth it's too slow, etc etc.
I really can't afford a new TrackIR right now and after hearing they have a habit of dying often the idea is even less appealing, but freetrack is not exactly doing a perfect job for me either and there's not many alternatives with so much widespread support.
Overall it's the precision i care about the most, since i fly with CEM and temperature effects enabled. Some Luftwaffe aircraft have instruments to monitor on the engine nacelles and many others have useful indicators on the wings (spit flaps, 109 radiators, ect), so being able to maintain a steady look over the wing without having to drop overall responsiveness to a crawl would be nice (this was an issue with trackIR as well, it's just that in the TIR software it's much easier to edit the response curves).
Do you think it's worth it to get a Playstation 3 camera that can do 120FPS and has a higher IR sensitivity as a dedicated FT camera?
What i mean is, will a higher frame rate allow faster response while still maintaining a smooth and precise ride?
These PS3 cams are quite cheap (about 30 Euros from a local e-shop) and it's easy to find customized PC drivers for most operating systems, so if the higher native FPS makes a difference i'd be willing to give it a go.