Quote:
Originally Posted by paper
lol fanboy CoD you should look people around you and around the world.
For il-2 1946's the game is actually a fail.
I should make a video of all things wich are not real in the game compare to il-2 1946 ...
Maximum speed has not effect ... G effect are not really dangerous for the plane (it's rare to breack the plane because of speed + G ) ... Landing are sooooo easy ! The list goes on and a fanboy won't understand it.
By physics i don't speak about visual aspect, but fly aspect.
6th aspect , both have failed.
Go to fly in the real life , and play rof/ il-1946 , and go back to clod maybe you will understand.
I'm here just to say the reality in order that developper can improve the game. I won't say "your game is perfect oh yesss" , it's false it is not.
ps: read, i told you good game ( WW air plane sim ) RoF and il-2 1946 + AEP
And agree with you , the game need lot of work to be finished. ^^
|
Fanboi? What because I see potential? Also this doesn't answer my point which was "Define a "good game." Attacking me doesn't refute anything.
Again as I said 1946 had growning pains, and again thanks for the reminder.
Uhhhhhh, not an argument to what I said.
Again no one refuted it has bugs.........
Urm, not a valid argument to my point arguing yours.......
What? You seem to not understand logical arguments.
Simulation and real life are very different. Current technology (and past) cannot completely recreate reality.
Thank you for trying but you seem to fail simple logic 101.
I don't care if you call me a fanboy for simply pointing out the failings of your logic. Yes, I am hopeful that this sim will fruit, but name calling accomplishes nothing.