Quote:
Originally Posted by F19_lacrits
Are you complaining at the screen shot in game of the cliffs.. comparing it to real world photos.. !? You should get back down on earth and realize it is a game and the map is quite huge with a lot of objects and details. If you wanted better reproduction of the cliffs then you would have to sacrifice something else. It's all a balance.. I think it's most important to have map features that looks like the real deal but is not necessarily the real deal in all it's details.
You should go back to flying 2D FSX with 3D features again.. It looks more photo realistic, although it's more like painting than full 3D modelling when it comes to the scenery.
|
First, not everybody knows how the Cliffs of Etretat look like, so photos are there for information purposes. I nver said I wanted the game to look like pictures.
Second :
Come on, look at that Clodo screenshot. Don't you have a problem with the water and its perspective ? The land looks like it is floating 20 meters over the surface, out of range of the water, whoch seems not to be at the same level at all !
IL2 had 10 years ago at least mock up waves that were doing the trick. Overall, IL2 gives a better impression of reality that... that !
As you say, it's important it looks like real. I'm a pilot IRL too, and I tell you, this looks nothing like real life. It looks like a teletubby colored piece of shit !
I already see the critics on Angry Video Game Nerd....