Quote:
Originally Posted by Kubiszko
Because the board had a guard's head and shoulders, and not obstruct the view.Its logical!For what Tempest or P-47 has drip shield cockpit?For worst visibility or for beter?
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by klem
By the simplest means possible. I turn my head and I see that far too much of the rear view is obstructed.
...
The armour plate appears to be too wide. It was essentially narrower than its height and not roughly equal in height and width as it appears to be in the current rear view.
Like Kubisko and other past posters I don't understand why you are having such a hard time accepting this.
|
Guys... do you really expect us to change a cockpit part to a wrong size/proportion by will? Never!
Oh I have seen the result of the guy, who thought, that was a good idea... disgusting!
Here... this is the best grafic... made by someone else, that I found, so I don't have to do an own... compare for yourself:
(Typhoon, but should be the same)
The reason for the bad view in game is the problem, that is this thread about
: the ugly
fixed PoV. You demand (sorry I understand it that way) from us, that we should change the model instead of looking for a good solution? I really cannot go with that foulty solution. What about all other planes? Each one of them is suffering from fixed PoV! Thats a fact!
Did you fly Mc.200/202/205 series lately? Checked PoV? It had been changed with 4.10. Moved forward for 202 and much more for 205 (making them all equally). The rear view was very worse before, now its ok (still a penalty without 6DoF). Or what about Ki-43 I ? No problem with that one? Moving the PoV is the only thing we can consider as an approach to make the resampling better to the real thing, but changing the model... no.