Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Blackdog_kt
I don't remember if it's in this very thread, but i sat through the entire BBC documentary about the battle of Britain that someone linked on youtube and at one point a surviving RAF veteran (i think it was Tom Neil) talks about the advantages and disadvantages of Spit vs 109.
|
Here is the
BBC Doc:
For the Spit enthusiasts: Part 4 is the part were they talk about the advantages and disadvantages of Spit vs 109...
[i]A fresh analysis into the Battle of Britain, exploring the German point of view, and highlighting the role of those who supported the Few during the summer of 1940.
Focusing on the tactics, technologies and intelligence available to both sides, Mr. Holland examines the ways in which both Germany and Britain used their resources: from aircraft to air defence, and from intelligence to organisation. And, by gaining rare firsthand testimony from German veterans, and access to the untapped diaries and documents we reveal that this was a battle of two sides and many layers.[/]
-------------------------
Spit vs Me 109 Part 4 from Min. 3 sec 20....
Spit
14.7 sec of fire Pee Shooter Ammo
vs Me 109
55 sec of fire.. nearly 4 times as long!
If this and other facts are modeld in Olegs "realistic Simulation" "Cliffs of Dover".... no one will fly spit.....
---